DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volkswagen Golf vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Golf

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeLand Rover
GolfModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
201 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower117 HP
168 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4397 mmLength4368 mm
1735 mmWidth1809 mm
1473 mmHeight1708 mm
1115 KgWeight1510 Kg
2515 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volkswagen Golf and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Golf leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…