1998 • Bugatti
EB 112
Bugatti EB 112 6.0 V12 (461 Hp) 1998Overall Score92.5/100
1998 Bugatti EB 112 vs 2015 Artega Scalo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Artega
Scalo
Artega Scalo 2015Overall Score67.25/100
WINNER
Bugatti EB 112
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 25.25 points.
92.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Bugatti EB 112SpecificationArtega Scalo
BugattiMakeArtega
EB 112ModelScalo
1998Model year2015
SedanBody typeCoupe
4Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Bugatti EB 112SpecificationArtega Scalo
4,7 s0–100 km/h3,6 s
300 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5995 ccEngine displacement0 cc
461 HPPower0 HP
590 NmTorque780 Nm
12Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Bugatti EB 112SpecificationArtega Scalo
PetrolFuel typeElectric
120 ltFuel tank0 lt
25 ltUrban consumption—
12 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Bugatti EB 112SpecificationArtega Scalo
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears1 Automatic
255/60 R17Tyre size235/35 R19 ZR; 285/30 R19 ZR
YesABS—
Dimensions
Bugatti EB 112SpecificationArtega Scalo
5070 mmLength4010 mm
1960 mmWidth1880 mm
1405 mmHeight1200 mm
1700 KgWeight1585 Kg
3100 mmWheelbase2460 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Bugatti EB 112 and 2015 Artega Scalo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Bugatti EB 112 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 25.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…