2016 • Bugatti
Chiron
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 (1500 Hp) 2016Overall Score98.5/100
2016 Bugatti Chiron vs 2019 Koenigsegg Jesko Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2019 • Koenigsegg
Jesko
Koenigsegg Jesko 5.0 V8 (1280/1600 Hp) 2019Overall Score72.5/100
WINNER
Bugatti Chiron
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 26 points.
98.5–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Bugatti ChironSpecificationKoenigsegg Jesko
BugattiMakeKoenigsegg
ChironModelJesko
2016Model year2019
CoupeBody typeTarga
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Bugatti ChironSpecificationKoenigsegg Jesko
<2,5 s0–100 km/h—
420 km/hTop speed0 km/h
7993 ccEngine displacement0 cc
1500 HPPower1280 HP
1600 NmTorque1500 Nm
16Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Bugatti ChironSpecificationKoenigsegg Jesko
PetrolFuel typePetrol / Ethanol – E85
100 ltFuel tank72 lt
35,2 ltUrban consumption—
15,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
22,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Bugatti ChironSpecificationKoenigsegg Jesko
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7 DSGGears9 LST
—Tyre size265/35 R20; 325/30 R21
YesABS—
Dimensions
Bugatti ChironSpecificationKoenigsegg Jesko
4544 mmLength4610 mm
—Width2030 mm
1212 mmHeight1210 mm
1995 KgWeight1420 Kg
2711 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Bugatti Chiron and 2019 Koenigsegg Jesko approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Bugatti Chiron leads the E-Kıyasla score by 26 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
Comments are loading…