DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Bristol Speedster vs 1999 Rover 800 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bristol Speedster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 27 points.

91.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BristolMakeRover
SpeedsterModel800
2011Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,0 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
257 km/hTop speed220 km/h
5900 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
390 HPPower180 HP
500 NmTorque216 Nm
8Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
165 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/55 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4674 mmLength4882 mm
1752 mmWidth1730 mm
1118 mmHeight1393 mm
1395 KgWeight1395 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2766 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Bristol Speedster and 1999 Rover 800 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bristol Speedster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 27 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…