2012 • Volkswagen
Golf
Volkswagen Golf 1.4 (122 Hp) 2012Overall Score59.5/100
2012 Volkswagen Golf vs 2012 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.4 CNG (120 Hp) 2012Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen GolfSpecificationOpel Combo
VolkswagenMakeOpel
GolfModelCombo
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volkswagen GolfSpecificationOpel Combo
9,9 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
201 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
122 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen GolfSpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typePetrol / CNG
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volkswagen GolfSpecificationOpel Combo
4534 mmLength4390 mm
1781 mmWidth1831 mm
1504 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
1394 KgWeight—
2578 mmWheelbase2755 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volkswagen Golf and 2012 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…