2011 • Bristol
Fighter
Bristol Fighter 8.0 i V10 (532 Hp) 2011Overall Score91.5/100
2011 Bristol Fighter vs 2017 Hennessey Venom GT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Hennessey
Venom GT
Hennessey Venom GT 7.0 V8 (1261 Hp) 2017Overall Score93.5/100
WINNER
Hennessey Venom GT
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.
91.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Bristol FighterSpecificationHennessey Venom GT
BristolMakeHennessey
FighterModelVenom GT
2011Model year2017
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Bristol FighterSpecificationHennessey Venom GT
4,0 s0–100 km/h—
340 km/hTop speed435 km/h
7996 ccEngine displacement7000 cc
532 HPPower1261 HP
712 NmTorque1566 Nm
10Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Bristol FighterSpecificationHennessey Venom GT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank70 lt
25 ltUrban consumption—
12 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Bristol FighterSpecificationHennessey Venom GT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
285/40 R18Tyre size265/30 R19; 345/30 R20
YesABS—
Dimensions
Bristol FighterSpecificationHennessey Venom GT
4420 mmLength4655 mm
1795 mmWidth1960 mm
1345 mmHeight1135 mm
1475 KgWeight1244 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Bristol Fighter and 2017 Hennessey Venom GT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hennessey Venom GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
Comments are loading…