DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Fox vs 2010 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Fox

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
FoxModelCaddy
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats5/7
3Doors5

Performance

14,7 s0–100 km/h17,7 s
161 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
70 HPPower75 HP
155 NmTorque210 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3828 mmLength4405 mm
1660 mmWidth1802 mm
1544 mmHeight1833 mm
1085 KgWeight1505-1626 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2682 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Fox and 2010 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Fox leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…