DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Volkswagen Eos vs 2013 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
EosModelXC70
2015Model year2013
Coupe - CabrioletBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
238 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
210 HPPower245 HP
280 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears8
215/55 R16; 235/40 R18Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4423 mmLength4838 mm
1791 mmWidth1876 mm
1444 mmHeight1604 mm
1563 KgWeight—
2578 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Volkswagen Eos and 2013 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…