DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volkswagen Eos vs 2013 Mini Countryman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Countryman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMini
EosModelCountryman
2013Model year2013
Coupe - CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats4/5
2Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
207 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
140 HPPower143 HP
320 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/55 R16; 235/40 R18Tyre size205/55 R17 91V RSC
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4423 mmLength4110 mm
1791 mmWidth1789 mm
1444 mmHeight1561 mm
1592 KgWeight1320 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volkswagen Eos and 2013 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Countryman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…