DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Volkswagen Eos vs 2006 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMazda
EosModel3
2006Model year2006
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
206 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque187 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4407 mmLength4420 mm
1791 mmWidth1755 mm
1443 mmHeight1465 mm
1548 KgWeight1235 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Volkswagen Eos and 2006 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…