DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Brilliance V3 vs 2015 Mini Paceman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Paceman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeMini
V3ModelPaceman
2015Model year2015
CrossoverBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
112 HPPower112 HP
145 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption4,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4109 mm
1790 mmWidth1786 mm
1600 mmHeight1518 mm
1350 KgWeight1310 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2596 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Brilliance V3 and 2015 Mini Paceman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Paceman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…