DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2013 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeHonda
CaddyModelFIT
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
280 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
0 ltFuel tank32 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
6Gears—
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4406 mmLength3955 mm
1794 mmWidth1695 mm
1823 mmHeight1525 mm
1576 KgWeight1080 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volkswagen Caddy and 2013 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…