DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2023 Ford Puma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

62.25–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
CaddyModelPuma
2015Model year2023
Minivan, KombiBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
172 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement999 cc
102 HPPower95 HP
250 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
5Gears6
—TransmissionManual
195/65 R15Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4878 mmLength4186 mm
1793 mmWidth1805 mm
1831 mmHeight1536 mm
1587 KgWeight1269 kg
—Luggage capacity456 lt
3006 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford PumaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlLane Keeping AssistCollision Avoidance SystemComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Volkswagen Caddy and 2023 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…