DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2012 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points.

60.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
CaddyModelCaddy
2009Model year2012
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5/7Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

13,3 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
166 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
105 HPPower170 HP
250 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6 DSG
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4405 mmLength4406 mm
1802 mmWidth1794 mm
1833 mmHeight1823 mm
1446-1567 KgWeight1588 Kg
2682 mmWheelbase2681 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volkswagen Caddy and 2012 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…