DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Brilliance M2 vs 2008 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeSubaru
M2ModelForester
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
210 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
130 HPPower150 HP
173 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4648 mmLength4485 mm
1800 mmWidth1735 mm
1450 mmHeight1590 mm
1455 KgWeight1390 Kg
—Wheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Brilliance M2 and 2008 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…