DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2011 Volkswagen Fox Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Fox

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolkswagen
CaddyModelFox
2011Model year2011
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

17,6 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
150 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
75 HPPower70 HP
225 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size185/60 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength3828 mm
1794 mmWidth1660 mm
1823 mmHeight1544 mm
1402 KgWeight1085 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volkswagen Caddy and 2011 Volkswagen Fox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Fox leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…