DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2000 Ford Cougar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
CaddyModelCougar
2012Model year2000
MinivanBody typeCoupe
5/7Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
168 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
102 HPPower131 HP
250 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength4700 mm
1794 mmWidth1777 mm
1823 mmHeight1320 mm
1402 KgWeight1315 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volkswagen Caddy and 2000 Ford Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…