DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2009 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
CaddyModelV50
2009Model year2009
MinivanBody typeEstate
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
164 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
102 HPPower100 HP
148 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4405 mmLength4522 mm
1802 mmWidth1845 mm
1833 mmHeight1457 mm
1446-1567 KgWeight1335 Kg
2682 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volkswagen Caddy and 2009 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…