DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2003 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeCitroen
CaddyModelXsara
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeEstate
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
164 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
102 HPPower101 HP
148 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank54 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4405 mmLength4167 mm
1802 mmWidth1698 mm
1833 mmHeight1405 mm
1446-1567 KgWeight1070 Kg
2682 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volkswagen Caddy and 2003 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…