DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2010 Chery Sweet (QQ) Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeChery
CaddyModelSweet (QQ)
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,6 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
151 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1051 cc
80 HPPower53 HP
132 NmTorque83 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size155/65 R13; 175/60 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4405 mmLength3550 mm
1802 mmWidth1508 mm
1833 mmHeight1491 mm
1456-1540 KgWeight850 Kg
2682 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Caddy and 2010 Chery Sweet (QQ) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…