DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2005 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeSkoda
CaddyModelFabia
2003Model year2005
MinivanBody typeEstate
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,9 s0–100 km/h21,6 s
148 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement997 cc
75 HPPower50 HP
126 NmTorque84 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4405 mmLength4220 mm
1802 mmWidth1646 mm
1833 mmHeight1452 mm
1446-1567 KgWeight1010 Kg
2682 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volkswagen Caddy and 2005 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…