DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeAlfa Romeo
CaddyModelMiTo
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats4/5
5Doors3

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
169 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
105 HPPower85 HP
175 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption4,4 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption2,9 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption3,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength4063 mm
1794 mmWidth1720 mm
1823 mmHeight1446 mm
1388 KgWeight1150 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volkswagen Caddy and 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…