DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Brilliance M2 vs 2009 Skoda Yeti Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeSkoda
M2ModelYeti
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
185 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
165 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size215/60 R16; 225/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4648 mmLength4223 mm
1800 mmWidth1793 mm
1450 mmHeight1691 mm
1480 KgWeight1545 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Brilliance M2 and 2009 Skoda Yeti approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…