DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Brilliance M2 vs 2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeAlfa Romeo
M2ModelMiTo
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors2/3

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,4 s
185 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
136 HPPower135 HP
165 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank45 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4648 mmLength4060 mm
1800 mmWidth1720 mm
1450 mmHeight1440 mm
1480 KgWeight1135 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Brilliance M2 and 2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…