DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volkswagen Bora vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMG
BoraModelZS
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
194 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
110 HPPower117 HP
155 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4376 mmLength4520 mm
1735 mmWidth1700 mm
1446 mmHeight1390 mm
1225 KgWeight1125 Kg
2519 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volkswagen Bora and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…