DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volkswagen Arteon vs 2017 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Arteon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
ArteonModelXC90
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

5,6 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
280 HPPower310 HP
350 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank71 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
7 DSGGears8
245/45 R18; 245/40 R19; 245/35 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4862 mmLength4950 mm
1871 mmWidth1923 mm
1450 mmHeight1776 mm
1716 KgWeight—
2837 mmWheelbase2984 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volkswagen Arteon and 2017 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Arteon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…