DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volkswagen Amarok vs 2014 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
AmarokModelRanger
2014Model year2014
Pick-upBody typePick-up
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,3 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement3198 cc
160 HPPower200 HP
300 NmTorque470 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption12,0 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5181 mmLength5359 mm
1944 mmWidth1850 mm
1820 mmHeight1815 mm
1737 KgWeight2073 Kg
3095 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volkswagen Amarok and 2014 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…