DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volkswagen Amarok vs 2012 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Amarok

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeBMW
AmarokModelX3
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
160 HPPower143 HP
300 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank67 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/60 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5254 mmLength4648 mm
1944 mmWidth1881 mm
1834 mmHeight1661 mm
1842 KgWeight1660 Kg
3095 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volkswagen Amarok and 2012 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Amarok leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…