DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Amarok vs 2016 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
AmarokModelV40
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,9-13.3 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
164 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
140 HPPower122 HP
340 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5254 mmLength4369 mm
1944 mmWidth1857 mm
1834 mmHeight1439 mm
1861 KgWeight—
3095 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Amarok and 2016 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…