DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Amarok vs 2010 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Amarok

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeVolvo
AmarokModelV50
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,9-13.3 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
164 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
140 HPPower136 HP
340 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank52 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5254 mmLength4522 mm
1944 mmWidth1845 mm
1834 mmHeight1457 mm
1861 KgWeight1472 Kg
3095 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Amarok and 2010 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Amarok leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…