1996 • Vector
M12
Vector M12 5.7 (492 Hp) 1996Overall Score55.25/100
1996 Vector M12 vs 1996 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Oldsmobile
Eighty-Eight
Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight 3.8 V6 Supercharger (243 Hp) 1996Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 20.5 points.
55.25–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Vector M12SpecificationOldsmobile Eighty-Eight
VectorMakeOldsmobile
M12ModelEighty-Eight
1996Model year1996
—Body typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4
Performance
Vector M12SpecificationOldsmobile Eighty-Eight
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
492 HPPower243 HP
0 NmTorque380 Nm
—Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Vector M12SpecificationOldsmobile Eighty-Eight
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Vector M12SpecificationOldsmobile Eighty-Eight
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
—Tyre size225/60 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Vector M12SpecificationOldsmobile Eighty-Eight
—Length5090 mm
—Width1880 mm
—Height1410 mm
—Weight1590 Kg
—Wheelbase2815 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Vector M12 and 1996 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight leads the E-Kıyasla score by 20.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…