DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Brilliance BS4 vs 2012 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeOpel
BS4ModelCombo
2012Model year2012
—Body typeMinivan
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,4 s
0 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
134 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4390 mm
—Width1831 mm
—Height1845-2100 mm
—Wheelbase2755 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Brilliance BS4 and 2012 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…