DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Brilliance BS4 vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeFiat
BS4ModelBravo
2012Model year2012
—Body typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
134 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4336 mm
—Width1792 mm
—Height1498 mm
—Weight1320 Kg
—Wheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Brilliance BS4 and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…