DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 TVR Tamora vs 2003 Jaguar XJR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

TVR Tamora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TVRMakeJaguar
TamoraModelXJR
2006Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,4 s
0 km/hTop speed254 km/h
3605 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
360 HPPower363 HP
290 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank81 lt
—Urban consumption18,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size255/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3925 mmLength5024 mm
1715 mmWidth1799 mm
1204 mmHeight1314 mm
1060 KgWeight1775 Kg
2361 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 TVR Tamora and 2003 Jaguar XJR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, TVR Tamora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…