DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 TVR S vs 1994 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

TVR S

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

69.75–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TVRMakeLand Rover
SModelRange Rover
1996Model year1994
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
235 km/hTop speed179 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3947 cc
240 HPPower182 HP
366 NmTorque312 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank82 lt
17 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption14,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3958 mmLength4449 mm
1665 mmWidth1818 mm
1223 mmHeight1790 mm
1060 KgWeight1892 Kg
2387 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 TVR S and 1994 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, TVR S leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…