DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 TVR S vs 1996 Mercury Sable Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TVR SSpecificationMercury Sable
TVRMakeMercury
SModelSable
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

TVR SSpecificationMercury Sable
6,9 s0–100 km/h—
226 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2933 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
170 HPPower147 HP
234 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

TVR SSpecificationMercury Sable
PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank61 lt
13 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

TVR SSpecificationMercury Sable
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

TVR SSpecificationMercury Sable
3958 mmLength5070 mm
1665 mmWidth1850 mm
1223 mmHeight1410 mm
1060 KgWeight1535 Kg
2387 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 TVR S and 1996 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…