DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Brilliance A1 vs 2008 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeMazda
A1Model3
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,6 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
107 HPPower109 HP
140 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4180 mmLength4415 mm
1755 mmWidth1755 mm
1460 mmHeight1465 mm
—Weight1275 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Brilliance A1 and 2008 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…