DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 TVR Griffith vs 2000 Mercedes-Benz CL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

TVR Griffith

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

88.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TVRMakeMercedes-Benz
GriffithModelCL
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

4,5 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
271 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4997 ccEngine displacement5439 cc
340 HPPower360 HP
481 NmTorque530 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank88 lt
—Urban consumption19,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,6 lt
—Average consumption13,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R16Tyre size245/45 R18; 275/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4050 mmLength4993 mm
1760 mmWidth1857 mm
1180 mmHeight1398 mm
1060 KgWeight1795 Kg
2282 mmWheelbase2885 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 TVR Griffith and 2000 Mercedes-Benz CL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, TVR Griffith leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…