DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 TVR Griffith vs 2000 TVR Griffith Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

TVR Griffith

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.5–88.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TVRMakeTVR
GriffithModelGriffith
1996Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

4,5 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
271 km/hTop speed271 km/h
4997 ccEngine displacement4997 cc
340 HPPower340 HP
481 NmTorque481 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank57 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R16Tyre size235/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4050 mmLength4050 mm
1760 mmWidth1760 mm
1180 mmHeight1180 mm
1060 KgWeight1060 Kg
2282 mmWheelbase2282 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 TVR Griffith and 2000 TVR Griffith approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, TVR Griffith leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…