DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 TVR Chimaera vs 2000 AC ACE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC ACE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TVR ChimaeraSpecificationAC ACE
TVRMakeAC
ChimaeraModelACE
1996Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

TVR ChimaeraSpecificationAC ACE
5,5 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
271 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4997 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
340 HPPower326 HP
481 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

TVR ChimaeraSpecificationAC ACE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption15,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

TVR ChimaeraSpecificationAC ACE
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R16Tyre size235/45 ZR17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

TVR ChimaeraSpecificationAC ACE
3965 mmLength4420 mm
1730 mmWidth1870 mm
1223 mmHeight1300 mm
1060 KgWeight1510 Kg
2282 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 TVR Chimaera and 2000 AC ACE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC ACE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…