DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 TVR Chimaera vs 2005 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TVRMakeFord
ChimaeraModelExplorer
2003Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
240 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
240 HPPower213 HP
374 NmTorque339 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank85 lt
17 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16; 225/50 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3965 mmLength4810 mm
1730 mmWidth1830 mm
1223 mmHeight1830 mm
1060 KgWeight1965 Kg
2282 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 TVR Chimaera and 2005 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…