DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW Z4 vs 2016 Tata Safari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Safari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z4SpecificationTata Safari
BMWMakeTata
Z4ModelSafari
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

BMW Z4SpecificationTata Safari
7,9 s0–100 km/h—
221 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
156 HPPower156 HP
240 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z4SpecificationTata Safari
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank63 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z4SpecificationTata Safari
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z4SpecificationTata Safari
4239 mmLength4655 mm
1790 mmWidth1965 mm
1291 mmHeight1922 mm
1395 KgWeight—
2496 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW Z4 and 2016 Tata Safari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Safari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…