DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 BMW Z4 vs 2013 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo XC60
BMWMakeVolvo
Z4ModelXC60
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo XC60
6,9 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
235 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
184 HPPower181 HP
270 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo XC60
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo XC60
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/45 R17 WTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo XC60
4239 mmLength4644 mm
1790 mmWidth1891 mm
1291 mmHeight1713 mm
1470 KgWeight1816-1935 Kg
2496 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 BMW Z4 and 2013 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…