DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW Z4 vs 2004 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo S40
BMWMakeVolvo
Z4ModelS40
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo S40
7,0 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
235 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
192 HPPower220 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo S40
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo S40
4091 mmLength4476 mm
1781 mmWidth1770 mm
1299 mmHeight1454 mm
1335 KgWeight1545 Kg
2495 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW Z4 and 2004 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…