DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 BMW Z4 vs 2002 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo S60
BMWMakeVolvo
Z4ModelS60
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo S60
7,0 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
235 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
192 HPPower210 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo S60
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z4SpecificationVolvo S60
4091 mmLength4576 mm
1781 mmWidth1804 mm
1299 mmHeight1428 mm
1335 KgWeight1475 Kg
2495 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 BMW Z4 and 2002 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…