DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Toyota Wish vs 2017 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Wish

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
WishModelC-Max
2017Model year2017
MinivanBody typeMpv
7Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
131 HPPower125 HP
161 NmTorque159 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
CVT-iGears5
—TransmissionManual
195/65 R15Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4600 mmLength4379 mm
1695-1720 mmWidth1858 mm
1600 mmHeight1610 mm
1450 KgWeight1374 kg
—Luggage capacity432 lt
2750 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Toyota Wish

No additional feature records are available.

Ford C-MaxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Toyota Wish and 2017 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Wish leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…