DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Toyota Wish vs 2016 Kia Cerato Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Wish

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeKia
WishModelCerato
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement1591 cc
131 HPPower130 HP
161 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
CVT-iGears6
—TransmissionAT
195/65 R15Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4600 mmLength4560 mm
1695-1720 mmWidth1780 mm
1600 mmHeight1445 mm
1450 KgWeight1210 kg
—Luggage capacity482 lt
2750 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Toyota Wish

No additional feature records are available.

Kia CeratoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Toyota Wish and 2016 Kia Cerato approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Wish leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…