DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Toyota Windom vs 2000 Toyota Cresta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Cresta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
WindomModelCresta
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
245 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
10 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,71 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears—
205/65 R15 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4750 mm
1790 mmWidth1755 mm
1395 mmHeight1420 mm
1480 KgWeight—
2670 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Toyota Windom and 2000 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Cresta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…