2000 • BMW
Z3
BMW Z3 2.8 (192 Hp) 2000Overall Score72.75/100
2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Cadillac Catera Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Cadillac
Catera
Cadillac Catera 3.0 (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Cadillac Catera
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW Z3SpecificationCadillac Catera
BMWMakeCadillac
Z3ModelCatera
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
BMW Z3SpecificationCadillac Catera
6,9 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
225 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2793 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
192 HPPower203 HP
300 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
BMW Z3SpecificationCadillac Catera
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW Z3SpecificationCadillac Catera
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/50 R16Tyre size225/55 HR16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW Z3SpecificationCadillac Catera
4050 mmLength4930 mm
1740 mmWidth1790 mm
1293 mmHeight1430 mm
1285 KgWeight1710 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Cadillac Catera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Cadillac Catera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…