DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota Verso vs 2016 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 21.25 points.

43–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
VersoModelC-Max
2012Model year2016
MPVBody typeMpv
5/7Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
185 km/hTop speed188 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
132 HPPower125 HP
0 NmTorque159 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4379 mm
1790 mmWidth1858 mm
1620 mmHeight1610 mm
—Weight1374 kg
—Luggage capacity432 lt
2780 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford C-MaxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota Verso and 2016 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 21.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…